Looks like every other template
You moved fast, picked a Webflow template, swapped colours, shipped. The site converts: barely: but it cannot anchor a Series A pitch, a sales deck, or a product launch. The visual system is rented, not owned.
Funky Rabbit is a founder-led SaaS branding agency that designs brand identity for SaaS startups, logo, palette, typography, voice and UI tokens, as one system your team can implement. Five working weeks, $2.5k-$9k, published. Everything survives in dashboards, ships with your engineering team, and stays sharp as features keep landing.
Three patterns we see in nearly every founder pitch we audit. If two or more sound familiar, you are leaving conversion on the table.
You moved fast, picked a Webflow template, swapped colours, shipped. The site converts: barely: but it cannot anchor a Series A pitch, a sales deck, or a product launch. The visual system is rented, not owned.
The mark looked great on the marketing site, then someone scaled it down to a 24px navbar avatar and the legibility collapsed. You now run two parallel brands, one for marketing, one for the app, and neither team owns the system.
Your sales team builds Keynote slides in Inter, the app ships in Roboto, the founder posts on LinkedIn in DM Sans. None of the surfaces compound. Brand recall stays at zero outside the homepage.
A complete, implementable system: not a logo PDF and a goodbye. Every artefact below is part of the standard scope.
Primary mark, wordmark, monogram, app icon, lockups for light + dark, and the rules for when to use which. Built to render at 16px and at billboard scale without redrawing.
Brand colours with HEX, RGB, OKLCH, and CSS variable names ready to paste into your Tailwind config or design tokens file. WCAG-checked for product surfaces.
Display, heading, body, and UI scales with explicit ratios. Includes a recommended licence path (Google Fonts, Adobe Fonts, or self-hosted) and a fallback stack.
Pulled from your founder interviews and customer research, with do / do-not examples for sales emails, marketing pages, error messages, and release notes.
A handoff your engineering team can actually use: CSS custom properties or Figma variables, covering colour, spacing, radius, shadow, and motion. No PNG screenshots.
Templates for sales decks, social tiles, email signatures, and a one-pager. So that whoever joins next week can hit publish without redesigning the world.
PDF + Notion-friendly Markdown so the system survives the team turnover that always happens around month 12. Source files included.
A generalist studio designs identity for a coffee shop, a fashion label, or an agency, and the same playbook gets applied to software. Designing identity for a SaaS startup is a different job: the output has to survive in environments most identity studios never test. The long version of that argument is brand identity for SaaS, the founder’s guide.
It has to render at 24 px next to a notification badge, then again at 800 px on a hero. It has to coexist with hundreds of UI states, loading skeletons, empty states, error toasts, without becoming visual noise. It has to hand off cleanly to engineering as design tokens, not as a Figma frame and an email saying "use this colour". And it has to age well: the brand you ship at seed has to still feel right when you raise Series B with three new product lines.
Two milestones to align on, one final delivery, no surprise scope creep.
Founder & team interviews, ICP review, competitive scan, and a working positioning doc you can read in 10 minutes.
Three distinct visual routes, each with mark, palette, type, and a sample app surface. We pick one together: no committee.
Full identity build-out: logo system, palette, typography, UI tokens, voice notes, marketing kit. Daily Loom walkthroughs.
Brand book, source files, token files, and a 60-min walkthrough with your team. Two weeks of free async support after delivery.
Same numbers every visitor sees, no discovery-call quote. The full table, with every discipline, is on the pricing page.
Logo system, palette, typography, voice notes, UI tokens, marketing kit and brand book, the standard five-week scope on this page. Focused scopes (wordmark, palette, type, one application surface) sit at the lower bound and ship in two to three weeks.
For a live product with real surface counts: audit, system, applications, rollout schedule, handoff. Runs as its own SaaS rebrand engagement.
Led by Mariia Reznichenko: designing since 2012, running Funky Rabbit since 2023.
Each route gets you a logo. They differ in who does the work, what you pay, and whether the result reaches your product.
| Big agency | Freelancer | AI logo tool | Funky Rabbit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | Account team, rotating designers | One person | You, prompting | Led by the founder-designer |
| Price | Quoted after discovery | Quoted per project | Subscription | Published: $2.5k-$9k |
| Timeline | Set by the account plan | Depends on availability | Minutes for a logo, no system | Five working weeks, fixed scope |
| Engineering handoff | PDF guidelines | Varies | None | Tokens as code: CSS variables, JSON, Figma variables |
| Tested in a real product UI | Rarely | Rarely | No | Every artefact, before it leaves the studio |
“I hired Maria for logo design and a brand book and honestly did not expect such a high-level result in such a short time. She understood the brand vision immediately and translated it into a strong visual identity.”
“Mariia led our project from branding and landing page design in Framer to the full UX/UI of the research platform. What impressed us most was her structured and product-focused approach.”
Full reviews, with where to verify each one, on the testimonials page. The brand identity work itself is in the LegalXSale case study.
Five working weeks end-to-end: one week of discovery, one week of direction, two weeks of system build, and one week of handoff. We can compress to four weeks for a hard launch deadline; we cannot compress below four without trading off quality.
Both. We work with pre-seed founders shipping their first identity, with seed-stage teams replacing a placeholder brand, and with Series A teams running their first proper rebrand. The engagement scope is the same; the tone of the discovery interviews changes.
Either. About a third of our SaaS engagements are full ground-up identity builds. The other two-thirds are evolutions: we keep the recognisable equity in your existing mark, then rebuild the system around it (palette, type, tokens, marketing kit). The discovery week tells us which path is right.
Identity ships with UI tokens (colour, spacing, radius, type scale, motion) so your engineering team can apply the brand to the product. Full UI/UX work: flows, screens, design system, is a separate engagement. The two are designed to fit together, and most clients run them sequentially.
As code, not as Figma screenshots. CSS custom properties, design tokens JSON, or Figma variables, whichever fits your stack. We run a 60-minute walkthrough with your engineering lead at the end of the engagement and answer follow-up questions async for two weeks at no cost.
A generalist studio tests an identity on a business card and a storefront. A SaaS branding agency tests it at 24 px next to a notification badge, in dark and light mode, and against hundreds of UI states, then hands it to engineering as tokens, not screenshots. The deliverables are the same words; the acceptance criteria are not.
Visual Identity runs $2.5k-$9k: the lower bound is a focused scope (wordmark, palette, type, one application surface) in two to three weeks; the upper bound is the full five-week system with UI tokens, marketing kit and brand book. A rebrand of a live SaaS is a separate engagement at $12k-$25k. The same numbers are on the pricing page for every visitor.
Adjacent reading, work, and routes to explore next.
Thirty minutes, no slides. We will look at your current identity together, name the gaps, and tell you whether a five-week engagement is the right call.
Start your projectNot ready for a call? Send your URL for a free 15-minute audit: we'll tell you whether it's a logo problem or a system problem.
We use cookies to see how the site is used and improve it. Analytics only run if you say yes. See our Privacy Policy.